Technology

Being human

Art is a problem.

Not in the sense that it is a waste of money, often unfathomable and occasionally obscene. It is a problem because of all the things people do it is the activity that cannot be easily explained by consulting their biological urges.

It stands out as a uniquely human activity. No other animal goes to such lengths to produce it, consume it and react to it in the way that people do. That’s why it is a problem. And a tricky one at that.

Patrick Tresset and Frederic Fol Leymarie are trying to shed light on it using a system called Aikon that aims to unpick and then copy how an artist works. The artist is Mr Tresset who has almost a decade of practice as a portrait artist to call on.

"We’re trying to understand what goes on in the mind of the person performing the act of drawing," said Prof Leymarie.

That understanding, gleaned from watching Mr Tresset at work and drawing on his own insights of how he works, has produced a system that uses a robot arm to sketch faces.

Robot arm artist, BBC

At no point, said Prof Leymarie, was the idea to create photo-realistic reproductions of faces. Instead the roughness of the finished sketches is key.

"It’s a cheap robot arm because we are trying to get away from something that’s a performance and very well engineered," he said "In part that’s because we are trying to capture the different elements and uncertainties that are expected from a human."

One key insight that developing the system has revealed is the difference in the amount of time that artists and non-artists spend looking at a subject when they are drawing.

Non-artists, said Prof Leymarie, spend their time looking at the paper. By contrast, he said, artists look at the subject and trust their hand to do the reproduction.

The collaboration between Mr Tresset and technology has been such that now the robot arm can produce sketches in its own distinctive style.

And, said Prof Leymarie, the collaboration does not end there.

"He can not only use it as a way to explore and understand what he is doing or what other artists are doing," he said. "He can use it as something more powerful.

"It can be used by artists to explore why they end up doing a certain type of art a certain way," he said.

Novel art

Mr Tresset and Prof Leymarie are not alone in using technology to tickle the creativity of artists and others.

At a Digital Expo to show off Goldsmiths College’s digital studio, Dan Jones created an installation that helped visitors explore interactive creativity.

It bonded motion capture to a virtual landscape. As a participant moved around the enclosed space, clapped their hands or spoke, the landscape was changed in response.

Mr Jones said the installation was related to the work he is doing to help scientists and artists explore all facets of their creativity.

Interactive art, BBC

In a similar way, he said, the creative journey that artists embark on when producing a work is really only one path through the larger landscape of all the things they could create.

"Through a lifetime of practice artists acquire habits and tropes," said Mr Jones. "One way out of that is adopting computational models that supplement their own creative process that can re-shape and re-direct that impulse."

Simulations based around small, smart software programs known as agents can help artists reach those areas of that creative landscape that they would otherwise never visit.

One product of this work is a system that can improvise and jam with musicians.

"What’s particularly interesting about it is that it’s inherently unpredictable and chaotic," he said. Often it takes musicians to places they have never been before and stretches their ability to improvise, to create.

Mr Jones work is also being applied to the sciences to help a group of researchers tackling leukaemia to understand how stem cells react to the disease. The interaction of visualisation and their deep knowledge of the biology could give them a far greater insight into how that system works.

Dr Mick Grierson, who oversees the work going on at Goldsmiths, said the projects go to the heart of what it means to be a maker, hacker, scientist or artist. And arguably a human. It is all about curiosity, creativity and innovation.

"That’s what makes science great, and technology great and art great," he said "It’s about playing with ideas.

"You try a few things out and see what happens, then try more and more and you come up with something that is genius," he said.

Only by building it, seeing and shaping it, can they truly understand. Something any and every maker can identify with.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

SeeSaw launches TV service

Sir Alan Sugar, The Apprentice

SeeSaw’s online TV service has launched in full for British internet users after less than a month of beta testing on 20,000 users.

The service offers viewers the chance to catch up for free on 3,000 hours of archive and recent programmes from the BBC, Channel 4 and Five.

Seesaw is funded by advertising – viewers see unskippable 60-second ad breaks before and during each show.

Advertisers including Ikea, Diageo and Kraft have already signed up.

Seesaw was born from technology bought by Arquiva from the aborted Project Kangaroo, an internet TV service supported by several UK broadcasters that was blocked by the Competition Commission.

Seesaw’s chief executive, John Keeling, told BBC News that the site would roll out a premium service in the next few months, which would involve customers making micropayments to view or "rent" major shows.

The company is still in negotiation with several US studios for their content.

Viewers choosing to rent a programme will have 48 hours to stream it without ads or return to it to watch again, he explained.

The BBC iPlayer offers viewers the chance to download and own programmes for 30 days but Seesaw’s user testing indicated that its customers would rather stream video, Mr Keeling said.

SeeSaw not Spotify

He denied that Seesaw was following in the footsteps of online music service Spotify with the two-tiered service.

"I can see the comparison but Spotify is more of a free and subscription hybrid – we’re looking at free and transactional pay-per-view hybrid," he said.

While the service will initially be purely a streaming outlet, there are plans to add social networking elements to the Seesaw site, said head of product and technology Richard Dines, who previously worked on Project Kangaroo.

Both Mr Dines and Mr Keeling were reluctant to make comparisons between the two initiatives.

"It’s a different story," said Mr Keeling. "Lessons were learned by the shareholders of Kangaroo. We have a different model – we don’t have broadcasters as shareholders."

However he credited the catch-up services developed individually by the major broadcasters – such as 4OD, the BBC iPlayer and Demand Five – for opening up a market for internet TV.

"You need a big player to change the way people watch television"

John Keeling, SeeSaw

"You need a big player to change the way people watch television," he said.

But with broadcasters already pointing viewers to their own services, the challenge for SeeSaw and similar companies such as Blinkbox is to divert enough users away, said Chris Curtis, news editor at industry publication Broadcast.

"The difficulty for all these guys is getting enough viewers to site to view the content to make the advertising model stack up," he said.

"It’s quite hard to get people to pay for content online. They might be prepared to make micropayments for the really big American shows but people generally associate conventional, standard TV with being free at point of viewing." </p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

US objects to Google books plan

Various book titles on a shelf

The US Department of Justice has said that it is still not satisfied with a deal that would allow search giant Google to build a vast digital library.

It said the plan failed to address antitrust and copyright concerns.

It echoes objections by online retailer Amazon, which has said that Google’s plan to scan and distribute millions of books online could lead to a monopoly.

Google were forced to amend details of the plan in 2009 after objections by the Department of Justice (DoJ).

"The amended settlement agreement still confers significant and possibly anti-competitive advantages on Google as a single entity," the DOJ said.

It said that the agreement would allow the Google to be "the only competitor in the digital marketplace with the rights to distribute and otherwise exploit a vast array of works in multiple formats".

‘Unaddressed issues’

Google Books – formerly known as Google print – was first launched in 2004. It was put on hold a year later when the Authors Guild of America and Association of American Publishers sued over "massive copyright infringement".

In 2008 Google agreed to pay $125m (£77m) to create a Book Rights Registry, where authors and publishers could register works and receive compensation for scanned books.

"It once again reinforces the value the agreement can provide in unlocking access to millions of books in the US"

Google spokesperson

Deadline looms for Google Books

A decision on whether the deal could go through was originally scheduled for October 2009. But, District Judge Denny Chin, presiding over the trial, sent the deal back to the drawing board after objections from around the world, including criticism by the DoJ.

The DoJ has once again waded into the debate.

It says the proposed settlement posed potential copyright and antitrust issues.

It also criticised the agreement for requiring authors to opt out of having their books included in the deal, rather than opting in.

It also said that authors and representatives of the publishing industry who had brokered the deal had inappropriately spoken for foreign authors and for authors of "orphan works".

Orphan books – of which there are thought to be five million – are titles where the authors cannot be found.

The DoJ said that Google’s exclusive access to these orphan works "remains unaddressed, producing a less than optimal result from a competition standpoint."

But Google said that the Department of Justice’s filing recognised "the progress made with the revised settlement".

"It once again reinforces the value the agreement can provide in unlocking access to millions of books in the US," it said.

"We look forward to Judge Chin’s review of the statement of interest from the Department and the comments from the many supporters who have filed submissions with the court in the last months."

A hearing on the settlement has been scheduled on 18 February. </p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

ISP cleared of copyright charge

Zachary Quinto and Chris Pine in Star Trek

In the first case of its kind, an Australian court has ruled that an internet service provider cannot be responsible for illegal downloading.

iiNet, Australia’s third largest ISP, was taken to court by a group of 34 movie production houses.

The group included the Australian divisions of Universal Pictures, Warner Brothers and 20th Century Fox.

They claimed that iiNet was guilty of copyright infringement for not preventing illegal downloads of films.

The movie group hired investigators to track the numbers of iiNet customers using BitTorrents to illegally download movies.

They wanted iiNet to warn the offenders and then cut them off if they continued to download. The group also wanted certain websites to be blocked by the ISP.

However, the judge ruled iiNet was not responsible for the online behaviour of its customers.

"I find that the mere provision of access to the internet is not the ‘means’ of infringement," said Federal Court Justice Dennis Cowdroy.

"If the ISPs become responsible for the acts of their customers, essentially they become this giant and very cheap mechanism for anyone with any sort of legal claim."

In Italy, meanwhile, the government is proposing new laws which would make video channels such as YouTube directly responsible for copyright infringement if their users upload copyrighted material.

The proposals would require YouTube, owned by Google, to acquire a broadcasting licence in order to operate. </p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Sky launches 3D channel in pubs

People in a pub wearing 3D glasses

Sky is kicking off the UK’s first 3D channel with a live Premier League football match to be broadcast from nine pubs around the UK this weekend.

The match between Arsenal and Manchester United will be viewable in 3D in pubs in London, Manchester, Cardiff, Edinburgh and Dublin.

In April Sky will roll out its 3D channel to hundreds of other pubs.

Later in the year, Sky 3D will be made available to all Sky+HD customers with a range of content on offer.

This will include movies, sport, documentaries and entertainment.

Sky 3D will initially be available as a free add-on for those with Sky+HD boxes.

Viewers need to wear a special pair of glasses to watch the content.

There has been a great deal of hype around the technology since cinemas began showing films in 3D.

Avatar, shot in 3D, has become the highest grossing film of all time.

It is expected that 3D-ready TVs will hit the consumer market later this year.

"People have already embraced 3D cinema and because Sky’s 3D service uses the same kind of technology, we’re confident there will be demand for sport, movies, concerts and drama in 3D," said Gerry O’Sullivan, SKy’s director of strategic product development.

In February, two rugby matches in the Six Nations championship will be filmed in 3D and shown at cinemas around the UK.

The 2010 World Cup will also be filmed in the format.

The BBC was the first to show a 3D sports event, broadcasting an England versus Scotland rugby match at the Six Nations championship in 2008.

HOW 3D BROADCASTS WORK

Sky graphic


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Sky launches 3D channel in pubs

People in a pub wearing 3D glasses

Sky is kicking off the UK’s first 3D channel with a live Premier League football match to be broadcast from nine pubs around the UK this weekend.

The match between Arsenal and Manchester United will be viewable in 3D in pubs in London, Manchester, Cardiff, Edinburgh and Dublin.

In April Sky will roll out its 3D channel to hundreds of other pubs.

Later in the year, Sky 3D will be made available to all Sky+HD customers with a range of content on offer.

This will include movies, sport, documentaries and entertainment.

Sky 3D will initially be available as a free add-on for those with Sky+HD boxes.

Viewers need to wear a special pair of glasses to watch the content.

There has been a great deal of hype around the technology since cinemas began showing films in 3D.

Avatar, shot in 3D, has become the highest grossing film of all time.

It is expected that 3D-ready TVs will hit the consumer market later this year.

"People have already embraced 3D cinema and because Sky’s 3D service uses the same kind of technology, we’re confident there will be demand for sport, movies, concerts and drama in 3D," said Gerry O’Sullivan, SKy’s director of strategic product development.

In February, two rugby matches in the Six Nations championship will be filmed in 3D and shown at cinemas around the UK.

The 2010 World Cup will also be filmed in the format.

The BBC was the first to show a 3D sports event, broadcasting an England versus Scotland rugby match at the Six Nations championship in 2008.

HOW 3D BROADCASTS WORK

Sky graphic


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

$2m file-sharing fine is slashed

Steven Tyler, AP

An American woman told to pay $2m (£1.23m) for sharing 24 songs over the internet has had her fine slashed.

Following an appeal, Jammie Thomas-Rasset has now been ordered to pay the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) $54,000 (£33,420).

The judge who reduced the fine said the original multi-million dollar claim by the industry body was "monstrous".

Ms Thomas said her legal team was looking at ways to get the fine reduced even more.

"Whether it’s $2m or $54,000, I’m a mom with four kids and one income and we’re not exactly rolling in that kind of dough right now," she said.

Shocking

The RIAA first took legal action against Ms Thomas in 2007. She was accused of pirating almost 2,000 tracks but the record companies sought damages for only 24 of them.

The pirated songs included tracks by Aerosmith, Def Leppard, Green Day and Gloria Estefan. Found guilty, Ms Thomas was ordered to pay damages of $200,000.

Ms Thomas was re-tried in 2009 following mistakes made during the initial case. She was found guilty again and told to pay $1.92m.

Ms Thomas appealed against the damages claim resulting in a reduced fine.

"The need for deterrence cannot justify a $2m verdict for stealing and illegally distributing 24 songs for the sole purpose of obtaining free music," wrote Judge Michael Davis who heard the appeal.

US law allows recording companies to ask for damages of between $750 and $30,000 for each song illegally downloaded. This can be raised by a jury to as much as $150,000 if it believes the piracy was wilful.

"It was the jury’s province to determine the award …and this Court has merely reduced that award to the maximum amount that is no longer monstrous and shocking," he added.

Judge Davis denied Ms Thomas’ request for a re-trial and told the RIAA it had seven days in which to accept the change or ask for a new trial to set new damages.

The RIAA said it was "analysing" the Judge’s decision and would respond in due course.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

Piracy ‘creates cultural deserts’

Lady Gaga

Countries like Spain run the risk of becoming "cultural deserts" because of online file-sharing, the music industry has claimed.

The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) says that global government legislation is essential to the sector’s survival.

It cited Spain as an example of a country which does not have laws in place to prevent illegal downloads.

The sales of albums by local artists there have fallen by 65% in five years.

Federation chairman John Kennedy said the situation in Spain is now "almost irreversible".

"Spain runs the risk of turning into a cultural desert," commented Rob Wells, Senior Vice President, Digital, at Universal Music Group.

"Drastic action needs to be taken in order to save the Spanish music industry"

Rob Wells, Universal Music Group

"Drastic action needs to be taken in order to save the Spanish music industry."

In a market that is "rigged by piracy" it is non-English language music which suffers the most when the music industry tightens its belt added Mr Kennedy.

This is because global stars such as Lady Gaga, who topped the digital download chart of 2009 with 9.8m downloads for her single Poker Face, are regarded as more secure investments.

Legislation required

In the UK the IFPI said it was supportive of the proposed Digital Economy Bill, which includes legislation to cut off persistent file sharers.

"If there is a risk of kids losing their internet connection, they will stop," said Mr Kennedy.

He described the loss of the recent court case against BitTorrent website Oink as "a terrible disappointment" and an indication that current laws in the UK are "out of touch with where life is".

He expressed support for the bill’s controversial clause 17, which would give the Secretary of State power to make changes to copyright laws.

"I hope they won’t throw clause 17 overboard," he said. "We want this to be futureproof."

However, companies such as Google and Facebook believe that the ability to make fundamental changes are too broad and could stifle innovation.

"IFPI is calling for a copyright ratchet that will remove due process and threaten our human rights," said Jim Killock, Executive Director of the Open Rights Group.

"Copyright holders cannot hope to micro-manage the behaviour of every consumer."

Despite the stranglehold the industry considers itself to be in, legitimate music services are starting to pay off, the IFPI believes.

Global digital revenues increased by 12% in 2009. In the US, iTunes is selling more music than Walmart and digital sales account for 40% of the industry’s revenue.

"The news from the commercial viewpoint is reasonably good but it’s not happening fast enough," said Mr Wells.

He highlighted Spotify as the most successful financial model and said that the Orange monkey service, a joint venture between Universal Music Group, 4Music and Orange, had acquired 110,000 subscribers since its launch in July 2009.

The pay-as-you-go service offers free access to music in exchange for a regular top-up of at least £10 a month.

"The music industry finally believes it is making progress in the battle against web piracy with governments taking action and legal music services beginning to prove viable," said BBC technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones.

"But the industry is still furious about what it sees as negligence by some governments notably Spain – and is warning that there is a growing threat to local artists posed by piracy." </p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.

YouTube turns movie rental outlet

By Maggie Shiels
Technology reporter, BBC News, Silicon Valley

YouTube sign

Video-sharing site YouTube is taking its first steps into the online movie rental business.

The fledgling service will go live on 22 January. Initially only five films will be available to rent.

The movies will come from the 2009 and 2010 Sundance Film Festival and will only be available in the US.

The move for the Google owned company represents a major for the site which has been looking for ways to boost its bottom line.

"This is a huge move for YouTube in the sense of them trying to monetise the site," Mike McGuire, principal analyst at Gartner Research told BBC News.

"This certainly opens the door for them with bigger movie studios."

Content providers will be able to set their own prices, with YouTube taking a cut of the revenue. All but one of the Sundance films is being offered for $3.99 (£2.50) each for users to watch over a 48-hour viewing period.

The site which is best known for its user-generated content, including dogs on skateboards and performing cats, said 20 hours of video is uploaded every minute.

Last August, Comscore reported that over 10 billion videos were streamed on YouTube.

Hollywood signs

Industry insiders say this first step into online rental is a curtain-raiser for more ambitious pay-per-view plans.

It is expected that in the near future the site will expand its rental catalogue with television shows and feature films from major studios.

Harry Potter movie

"Content is king in this kind of business and Sundance is a good first step," said Mr McGuire.

"Negotiating with the major studios over distribution rights however is not for the faint hearted. Google has to perfect its delivery model and its billing system."

YouTube already offers full-length films from Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer’s archives. It is expected similar deals like this will emerge in the coming weeks and months and extend to newer movies.

In its blog, YouTube hinted at that possibility.

"In the coming weeks we’ll also invite a small group of partners across other industries, in addition to independent film, to participate in this new option."

Some industry watchers say YouTube has had a tough time in the past persuading the studios to part with their crown jewels such as newly released movies and Hollywood blockbusters.

"YouTube has had little luck over the last several years wooing major studios and networks to stream premium content on the site, which would make it easier to draw advertising," said Ben Fritz of the Los Angeles Times.

"Most studios have instead opted to put their content on Hulu, a joint venture of NBC Universal, News Corp and Walt Disney that has had more success luring marketers."

Analysts point out that the pay-per-view movie offering will put YouTube in direct competition with other services including Apple’s iTunes store, Amazon.com and Microsoft’s XBox Live.

The first five films for rent are "The Cove," "Bass Ackwards," "One Too Many Mornings," "Homewrecker" and "Children of Invention."

The Sundance film festival runs until 31 January.</p


This article is from the BBC News website. © British Broadcasting Corporation, The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.


Copyright © 2010 New Years Eve Manchester, Events Listings, Parties & Venues In Manchester 2009 / 2010. Our mission is to provide you with the most comprehensive New Years Eve listings for Manchester, if you are looking for bars, pubs, clubs or even somewhere to eat - we've got it all here, comprehensively, on one easy to use website - www.new-years-eve-manchester.co.uk, part of the Tonight In My City Network. Sitemap



Put A Donk On It